Oklahoma Civil Procedure

Friday, September 29, 2017

Equitable division of contingent fee upheld; Burk factors did not apply

http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=481569

Posted by Jim Milton at 10:25 AM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Newer Post Older Post Home

About Me

Jim Milton
View my complete profile

Popular Posts

  • Legislative update, 2018 Oklahoma session
    Here are quick updates on Title 12 bills before the Oklahoma legislature: SB1550 would appear to create a new procedure for attacking a ju...
  • Gavel to Gavel: Greener Pastures?
    The Oklahoma House of Representatives plans to address whether to change the method of judicial selection in Oklahoma. One does not hav...
  • New fee shifting decision
    Debtor who paid off debt after collection lawsuit was filed but before a judgment was entered avoided an attorney fee award under 12 OS 936....
  • Judgment reversed where counsel was late for trial
    The Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals reversed a small claims court judgment where defendant's counsel was late for court due to a clerica...
  • Civility in motion practice
    I recently had occasion to review a seminar presentation that I gave ten years ago.  The topic was ethics in appellate and summary judgment ...
  • Summary judgment and 12 O.S. 2056
    Below is a link to a decision of the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals, along with a link to yesterday’s order by the Oklahoma Supreme Court...
  • Oklahoma Supreme Court holds that notice provided only via Facebook does not satisfy due process
    In a decision issued on October 14, 2014 , the Oklahoma Supreme Court engaged in a spirited debate over whether a Facebook message provided...
  • The Court's decision on the Ten Commandments
    The Court's decision on the Ten Commandments is now available for download on the Court's docket.  The main decision was entered on ...
  • Section 3009.1 of the Oklahoma Evidence Code upheld in face of constitutional challenge
    Notable decision.   http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=479345
  • Deciphering the Special Session
    From a quick look at the text of the bills signed by the Governor, the legislature appears to have played it safe by reenacting certain of t...

Labels

  • Attorney Disqualification (1)
  • Discovery Masters (1)
  • Due Process (1)
  • Judicial Nominating Commission (1)
  • Juries (1)
  • Legislation (2)
  • Notice (1)
  • Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals (3)
  • Oklahoma Discovery Code (1)
  • Oklahoma Supreme Court (4)
  • Social Media (2)
  • Summary Judgment (1)
  • Technology in the Courtroom (1)
  • Videoconferencing (1)

Crucial links

  • Full text of the Oklahoma Constitution
  • Single Subject Rule (and Reenactment Rule)
  • Douglas v. Cox Retirement Properties, Inc.
  • Title 12, Oklahoma Statutes
  • Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules
  • Rules for District Courts in Oklahoma
  • Local District Court Rules

Blog Archive

  • ►  2020 (1)
    • ►  August (1)
  • ►  2019 (2)
    • ►  October (2)
  • ►  2018 (4)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ▼  2017 (6)
    • ▼  September (2)
      • Equitable division of contingent fee upheld; Burk ...
      • Summary judgment reversed in collections case wher...
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2016 (7)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2015 (5)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2014 (7)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
  • ►  2013 (11)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2012 (8)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (2)
This Blog is made available by James C. Milton for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Blog publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
Picture Window theme. Powered by Blogger.