Oklahoma Civil Procedure

Tuesday, September 20, 2016

New decision interpreting Section 2403 regarding prejudicial evidence

Please note the following new decision, ordering a new trial based on 12 OS 2403 for prejudicial evidence of a prior conviction in a vehicle negligence case.   http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=479202
Posted by Jim Milton at 5:47 PM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Section 3009.1 of the Oklahoma Evidence Code upheld in face of constitutional challenge

Notable decision.  


http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=479345
Posted by Jim Milton at 5:45 PM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

About Me

Jim Milton
View my complete profile

Popular Posts

  • Summary judgment and 12 O.S. 2056
    Below is a link to a decision of the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals, along with a link to yesterday’s order by the Oklahoma Supreme Court...
  • New decision on attorney lien enforcement
    In a new decision addressing attorney charging liens, the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals held that a counterclaim for malpractice against t...
  • Texas Supreme Court adopts rules for expedited actions when amount at issue is $100,000 or less
    Read more here:  http://texaslawyer.typepad.com/texas_lawyer_blog/2013/02/after-tsunami-of-feedback-texas-supreme-court-revises-and-issues-r...
  • BNSF decision, limiting general jurisdiction
    http://journalrecord.com/2017/06/14/gavel-to-gavel-limiting-general-jurisdiction/
  • Civility in motion practice
    I recently had occasion to review a seminar presentation that I gave ten years ago.  The topic was ethics in appellate and summary judgment ...
  • What Happens Now? Weighing Section 2056, the Federal Anderson Trilogy Standard and the State Constitutional Right to Trial
    Over the past four years, many Oklahoma attorneys have wondered whether Section 2056 of the Oklahoma Pleading Code would forever change Okla...
  • Judgment reversed where counsel was late for trial
    The Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals reversed a small claims court judgment where defendant's counsel was late for court due to a clerica...
  • Mixed bag of bills
    In my Gavel to Gavel column in the Journal Record, I have described the mixed bag of bills offered up by the 2013 special session.  Some of ...
  • Supreme Court Rule revised
    Oklahoma Supreme Court Rule 1.27(a) is amended, removing a trap for the unwary regarding the deadline for cross- or counter-appeals. http://...
  • Courts lack jurisdiction on merits if action is deemed dismissed under 12 OS 2004(I)
    If an action is deemed dismissed without prejudice under 12 OS 2004(I) because (i) failure to serve within 180 days and (ii) failure to show...

Labels

  • Attorney Disqualification (1)
  • Discovery Masters (1)
  • Due Process (1)
  • Judicial Nominating Commission (1)
  • Juries (1)
  • Legislation (2)
  • Notice (1)
  • Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals (3)
  • Oklahoma Discovery Code (1)
  • Oklahoma Supreme Court (4)
  • Social Media (2)
  • Summary Judgment (1)
  • Technology in the Courtroom (1)
  • Videoconferencing (1)

Crucial links

  • Full text of the Oklahoma Constitution
  • Single Subject Rule (and Reenactment Rule)
  • Douglas v. Cox Retirement Properties, Inc.
  • Title 12, Oklahoma Statutes
  • Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules
  • Rules for District Courts in Oklahoma
  • Local District Court Rules

Blog Archive

  • ►  2020 (1)
    • ►  August (1)
  • ►  2019 (2)
    • ►  October (2)
  • ►  2018 (4)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2017 (6)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ▼  2016 (7)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ▼  September (2)
      • New decision interpreting Section 2403 regarding p...
      • Section 3009.1 of the Oklahoma Evidence Code uphel...
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2015 (5)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2014 (7)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
  • ►  2013 (11)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2012 (8)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (2)
This Blog is made available by James C. Milton for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Blog publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
Picture Window theme. Powered by Blogger.