Oklahoma Civil Procedure

Tuesday, September 20, 2016

New decision interpreting Section 2403 regarding prejudicial evidence

Please note the following new decision, ordering a new trial based on 12 OS 2403 for prejudicial evidence of a prior conviction in a vehicle negligence case.   http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=479202
Posted by Jim Milton at 5:47 PM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Section 3009.1 of the Oklahoma Evidence Code upheld in face of constitutional challenge

Notable decision.  


http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=479345
Posted by Jim Milton at 5:45 PM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

About Me

My photo
Jim Milton
Jim Milton is a shareholder with Hall Estill in Tulsa, Oklahoma, with more than 19 years of experience in the practice of law. Mr. Milton is a fellow in the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel (ACTEC).  Mr. Milton is listed in the Best Lawyers in America in the areas of commercial litigation, municipal litigation, trust and estate litigation, and water law. Mr. Milton is listed in Oklahoma Super Lawyers in the area of estate and trust litigation.
View my complete profile

Popular Posts

  • Summary judgment and 12 O.S. 2056
    Below is a link to a decision of the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals, along with a link to yesterday’s order by the Oklahoma Supreme Court...
  • Thirty-day appeal time runs from date of actual notice where court file contains no proof of compliance with the three-day mailing rule
    On April 16, 2012, the Oklahoma Supreme Court reinstated an appeal where the record showed that the appeal was initiated within 30 days of...
  • New decision on attorney lien enforcement
    In a new decision addressing attorney charging liens, the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals held that a counterclaim for malpractice against t...
  • New fee shifting decision
    Debtor who paid off debt after collection lawsuit was filed but before a judgment was entered avoided an attorney fee award under 12 OS 936....
  • Equitable division of contingent fee upheld; Burk factors did not apply
    http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=481569
  • Opening statements
    An excellent read on opening statements, from a legendary Oklahoma trial lawyer, of use to anyone with an interest in Oklahoma trial procedu...
  • Civility in motion practice
    I recently had occasion to review a seminar presentation that I gave ten years ago.  The topic was ethics in appellate and summary judgment ...
  • New decision interpreting Section 2403 regarding prejudicial evidence
    Please note the following new decision, ordering a new trial based on 12 OS 2403 for prejudicial evidence of a prior conviction in a vehicle...
  • Oklahoma Supreme Court addresses application of 20 OS 95.10
    The Oklahoma Supreme Court holds that 20 OS 95.10 does not require judicial disqualification upon appellate reversal and remand.  The statut...
  • Appealable denial
    Oklahoma Supreme Court carves another small exception to the rule that denials of summary judgment cannot be reviewed on appeal. http://www...

Labels

  • Attorney Disqualification (1)
  • Discovery Masters (1)
  • Due Process (1)
  • Judicial Nominating Commission (1)
  • Juries (1)
  • Legislation (2)
  • Notice (1)
  • Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals (3)
  • Oklahoma Discovery Code (1)
  • Oklahoma Supreme Court (4)
  • Social Media (2)
  • Summary Judgment (1)
  • Technology in the Courtroom (1)
  • Videoconferencing (1)

Crucial links

  • Full text of the Oklahoma Constitution
  • Single Subject Rule (and Reenactment Rule)
  • Douglas v. Cox Retirement Properties, Inc.
  • Title 12, Oklahoma Statutes
  • Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules
  • Rules for District Courts in Oklahoma
  • Local District Court Rules

Blog Archive

  • ►  2018 (4)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2017 (6)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ▼  2016 (7)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ▼  September (2)
      • New decision interpreting Section 2403 regarding p...
      • Section 3009.1 of the Oklahoma Evidence Code uphel...
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2015 (5)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2014 (7)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
  • ►  2013 (11)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2012 (8)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (2)
This Blog is made available by James C. Milton for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Blog publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
Picture Window theme. Powered by Blogger.