Oklahoma Civil Procedure

Monday, January 28, 2013

Voir dire and privacy

Must voir dire proceeding always be open to the public? Maine Supreme Court says yes.

http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/top_maine_court_says_voir_dire_must_be_public_even_when_answers_could_be_em/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=ABA+Journal+Top+Stories&utm_content=Google+Reader
Posted by Jim Milton at 8:38 PM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Newer Post Older Post Home

About Me

Jim Milton
View my complete profile

Popular Posts

  • Judgment reversed where counsel was late for trial
    The Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals reversed a small claims court judgment where defendant's counsel was late for court due to a clerica...
  • Legislative update, 2018 Oklahoma session
    Here are quick updates on Title 12 bills before the Oklahoma legislature: SB1550 would appear to create a new procedure for attacking a ju...
  • BNSF decision, limiting general jurisdiction
    http://journalrecord.com/2017/06/14/gavel-to-gavel-limiting-general-jurisdiction/
  • Commentary on the BNSF decision
    Follow the link for excellent commentary on the BNSF decision on general jurisdiction. http://journalrecord.com/2017/06/14/gavel-to-gavel-l...
  • Summary judgment and 12 O.S. 2056
    Below is a link to a decision of the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals, along with a link to yesterday’s order by the Oklahoma Supreme Court...
  • Equitable division of contingent fee upheld; Burk factors did not apply
    http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=481569
  • Courts lack jurisdiction on merits if action is deemed dismissed under 12 OS 2004(I)
    If an action is deemed dismissed without prejudice under 12 OS 2004(I) because (i) failure to serve within 180 days and (ii) failure to show...
  • Summary judgment reversed in collections case where pro se answer and MSJ response fairly raised fact issues regarding the balance owed
    Pro se defendant alleged sufficient facts in his answer to invoke accord and satisfaction and possible violation of consumer protection stat...
  • Supreme Court Rule revised
    Oklahoma Supreme Court Rule 1.27(a) is amended, removing a trap for the unwary regarding the deadline for cross- or counter-appeals. http://...
  • Summary judgment affirmed after plaintiff's affidavit is stricken
    In Kutz v. Deere & Co. , 2015 OK CIV APP 6 , the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals affirmed a summary judgment in favor of a defendant a...

Labels

  • Attorney Disqualification (1)
  • Discovery Masters (1)
  • Due Process (1)
  • Judicial Nominating Commission (1)
  • Juries (1)
  • Legislation (2)
  • Notice (1)
  • Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals (3)
  • Oklahoma Discovery Code (1)
  • Oklahoma Supreme Court (4)
  • Social Media (2)
  • Summary Judgment (1)
  • Technology in the Courtroom (1)
  • Videoconferencing (1)

Crucial links

  • Full text of the Oklahoma Constitution
  • Single Subject Rule (and Reenactment Rule)
  • Douglas v. Cox Retirement Properties, Inc.
  • Title 12, Oklahoma Statutes
  • Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules
  • Rules for District Courts in Oklahoma
  • Local District Court Rules

Blog Archive

  • ►  2020 (1)
    • ►  August (1)
  • ►  2019 (2)
    • ►  October (2)
  • ►  2018 (4)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2017 (6)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2016 (7)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2015 (5)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2014 (7)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
  • ▼  2013 (11)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ▼  January (2)
      • Civility in motion practice
      • Voir dire and privacy
  • ►  2012 (8)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (2)
This Blog is made available by James C. Milton for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Blog publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
Picture Window theme. Powered by Blogger.