Oklahoma Civil Procedure

Monday, January 28, 2013

Voir dire and privacy

Must voir dire proceeding always be open to the public? Maine Supreme Court says yes.

http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/top_maine_court_says_voir_dire_must_be_public_even_when_answers_could_be_em/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=ABA+Journal+Top+Stories&utm_content=Google+Reader
Posted by Jim Milton at 8:38 PM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Newer Post Older Post Home

About Me

Jim Milton
View my complete profile

Popular Posts

  • Commentary on the BNSF decision
    Follow the link for excellent commentary on the BNSF decision on general jurisdiction. http://journalrecord.com/2017/06/14/gavel-to-gavel-l...
  • Judgment reversed where counsel was late for trial
    The Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals reversed a small claims court judgment where defendant's counsel was late for court due to a clerica...
  • Opening statements
    An excellent read on opening statements, from a legendary Oklahoma trial lawyer, of use to anyone with an interest in Oklahoma trial procedu...
  • Courts lack jurisdiction on merits if action is deemed dismissed under 12 OS 2004(I)
    If an action is deemed dismissed without prejudice under 12 OS 2004(I) because (i) failure to serve within 180 days and (ii) failure to show...
  • Summary judgment reversed in collections case where pro se answer and MSJ response fairly raised fact issues regarding the balance owed
    Pro se defendant alleged sufficient facts in his answer to invoke accord and satisfaction and possible violation of consumer protection stat...
  • Oklahoma Supreme Court addresses application of 20 OS 95.10
    The Oklahoma Supreme Court holds that 20 OS 95.10 does not require judicial disqualification upon appellate reversal and remand.  The statut...
  • New decision interpreting Section 2403 regarding prejudicial evidence
    Please note the following new decision, ordering a new trial based on 12 OS 2403 for prejudicial evidence of a prior conviction in a vehicle...
  • Supreme Court Rule revised
    Oklahoma Supreme Court Rule 1.27(a) is amended, removing a trap for the unwary regarding the deadline for cross- or counter-appeals. http://...
  • New decision on attorney lien enforcement
    In a new decision addressing attorney charging liens, the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals held that a counterclaim for malpractice against t...
  • Equitable division of contingent fee upheld; Burk factors did not apply
    http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=481569

Labels

  • Attorney Disqualification (1)
  • Discovery Masters (1)
  • Due Process (1)
  • Judicial Nominating Commission (1)
  • Juries (1)
  • Legislation (2)
  • Notice (1)
  • Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals (3)
  • Oklahoma Discovery Code (1)
  • Oklahoma Supreme Court (4)
  • Social Media (2)
  • Summary Judgment (1)
  • Technology in the Courtroom (1)
  • Videoconferencing (1)

Crucial links

  • Full text of the Oklahoma Constitution
  • Single Subject Rule (and Reenactment Rule)
  • Douglas v. Cox Retirement Properties, Inc.
  • Title 12, Oklahoma Statutes
  • Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules
  • Rules for District Courts in Oklahoma
  • Local District Court Rules

Blog Archive

  • ►  2020 (1)
    • ►  August (1)
  • ►  2019 (2)
    • ►  October (2)
  • ►  2018 (4)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2017 (6)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2016 (7)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2015 (5)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2014 (7)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
  • ▼  2013 (11)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ▼  January (2)
      • Civility in motion practice
      • Voir dire and privacy
  • ►  2012 (8)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (2)
This Blog is made available by James C. Milton for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Blog publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
Picture Window theme. Powered by Blogger.